[liberationtech] 5g health effects?

[3gg]

That was a good read, thank you.

In a brief attempt to further educate myself on the matter, I was going 
to go ahead and read one of the papers linked from that article: 
"Distinguishing Polemic From Commentary in Science: Some Guidelines 
Illustrated With the Case of Sage and Burgio (2017)". But when I least 
expected it, I was greeted with the marvelous price tag of $50. So much 
for distinguishing polemic from commentary in science.

Have we already lost the fight on opening research paid with my taxpayer 
money to the public, or are we getting there?

Marc

On 3/1/21 11:42 AM, Sam King wrote:
> This article has a diagram of where 5g is in the electromagnetic 
> spectrum (along with some of the reasons why the general consensus is 
> that that's safe): 
> https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/16/science/5g-cellphones-wireless-cancer.html 
> <https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/16/science/5g-cellphones-wireless-cancer.html>
>
> -Sam
>
> On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 11:34 AM 3gg <3gg at shellblade.net 
> <mailto:3gg at shellblade.net>> wrote:
>
>     That makes sense, thank you. What isn't yet very clear to me is the
>     absolute scale of things. Where on that radiation scale would a
>     deployment of 5g lie at, what magnitudes are considered harmful by
>     recent research, and who backed that research?
>
>     I cannot navigate these papers without getting lost, but hopefully
>     you
>     can share your insights.
>
>     Thank you,
>
>     Marc
>
>     On 2/28/21 4:52 PM, Bill Woodcock wrote:
>     >
>     >> On Mar 1, 2021, at 1:40 AM, 3gg <3gg at shellblade.net
>     <mailto:3gg at shellblade.net>> wrote:
>     >> In your last statement, are you saying the health risk is
>     acceptable because you get to at least use your phone?
>     > No.  This isn’t about acceptable or not acceptable. That’s
>     subjective, and different for different people.
>     >
>     > This is just about “more” or “less.”
>     >
>     >                                  -Bill
>     >
>     -- 
>     GPG: B214 8642 71D9 D5F2 CB2E  D4D4 39B8 50B3 CB16 235E
>
>     https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org/ <https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org/>
>
>     -- 
>     Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable from any major
>     commercial search engine. Violations of list guidelines will get
>     you moderated: https://lists.ghserv.net/mailman/listinfo/lt
>     <https://lists.ghserv.net/mailman/listinfo/lt>. Unsubscribe,
>     change to digest mode, or change password by emailing
>     lt-owner at lists.liberationtech.org
>     <mailto:lt-owner at lists.liberationtech.org>.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ghserv.net/pipermail/lt/attachments/20210302/8eb57a00/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_0x39B850B3CB16235E.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 643 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ghserv.net/pipermail/lt/attachments/20210302/8eb57a00/attachment.key>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 236 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.ghserv.net/pipermail/lt/attachments/20210302/8eb57a00/attachment.sig>