<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>That was a good read, thank you.</p>
<p>In a brief attempt to further educate myself on the matter, I was
going to go ahead and read one of the papers linked from that
article: "Distinguishing Polemic From Commentary in Science: Some
Guidelines Illustrated With the Case of Sage and Burgio (2017)".
But when I least expected it, I was greeted with the marvelous
price tag of $50. So much for distinguishing polemic from
commentary in science.</p>
<p>Have we already lost the fight on opening research paid with my
taxpayer money to the public, or are we getting there?<br>
</p>
<p>Marc<br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 3/1/21 11:42 AM, Sam King wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAD=DypYqTxSHnn1ptut76yR=9rF_7Mi0tDg62TuOwUFkC3oJ1A@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>This article has a diagram of where 5g is in the
electromagnetic spectrum (along with some of the reasons why
the general consensus is that that's safe): <a
href="https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/16/science/5g-cellphones-wireless-cancer.html"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/16/science/5g-cellphones-wireless-cancer.html</a></div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>-Sam<br>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 11:34
AM 3gg <<a href="mailto:3gg@shellblade.net"
moz-do-not-send="true">3gg@shellblade.net</a>> wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">That
makes sense, thank you. What isn't yet very clear to me is the
<br>
absolute scale of things. Where on that radiation scale would
a <br>
deployment of 5g lie at, what magnitudes are considered
harmful by <br>
recent research, and who backed that research?<br>
<br>
I cannot navigate these papers without getting lost, but
hopefully you <br>
can share your insights.<br>
<br>
Thank you,<br>
<br>
Marc<br>
<br>
On 2/28/21 4:52 PM, Bill Woodcock wrote:<br>
><br>
>> On Mar 1, 2021, at 1:40 AM, 3gg <<a
href="mailto:3gg@shellblade.net" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">3gg@shellblade.net</a>> wrote:<br>
>> In your last statement, are you saying the health
risk is acceptable because you get to at least use your phone?<br>
> No. This isn’t about acceptable or not acceptable.
That’s subjective, and different for different people.<br>
><br>
> This is just about “more” or “less.”<br>
><br>
> -Bill<br>
><br>
-- <br>
GPG: B214 8642 71D9 D5F2 CB2E D4D4 39B8 50B3 CB16 235E<br>
<br>
<a href="https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org/" rel="noreferrer"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org/</a><br>
<br>
-- <br>
Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable from
any major commercial search engine. Violations of list
guidelines will get you moderated: <a
href="https://lists.ghserv.net/mailman/listinfo/lt"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.ghserv.net/mailman/listinfo/lt</a>.
Unsubscribe, change to digest mode, or change password by
emailing <a href="mailto:lt-owner@lists.liberationtech.org"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">lt-owner@lists.liberationtech.org</a>.<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>