[liberationtech] 5g health effects?

[3gg]

I mean peer reviews do matter, so to some extent, signatures are part of 
science. And there seems to be a lot of it from the link he shared earlier:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5376454/

https://www.iarc.who.int/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/pr208_E.pdf

Do you have any concerns with those studies and the results?

I also don't understand the last part; if RF exposure does have adverse 
health effects, what exactly is the net win, and for whom?

Marc

On 2/28/21 3:55 PM, Bill Woodcock wrote:
>
>> On Mar 1, 2021, at 12:36 AM, Greg <greg at kinostudios.com> wrote:
>> This letter signed by some 300k+ people
> Signatures =/= science.
>
>> includes links to studies showing supposed adverse health effects.
> Straw man.  The question isn’t whether RF exposure has adverse health effects, the question is whether reducing that exposure is a net win or a net loss.  Those who are not innumerate tend to go for the “net win” side of that equation.
>
>                                  -Bill
>
-- 
GPG: B214 8642 71D9 D5F2 CB2E  D4D4 39B8 50B3 CB16 235E

https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_0x39B850B3CB16235E.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 643 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ghserv.net/pipermail/lt/attachments/20210228/fad81c4c/attachment.key>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 236 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.ghserv.net/pipermail/lt/attachments/20210228/fad81c4c/attachment.sig>