[liberationtech] 5g health effects?

[Greg]

> On Feb 28, 2021, at 3:55 PM, Bill Woodcock <woody at pch.net> wrote:
> 
>> On Mar 1, 2021, at 12:36 AM, Greg <greg at kinostudios.com> wrote:
>> This letter signed by some 300k+ people
> 
> Signatures =/= science.

Did you or someone else claim signatures = science?

> 
>> includes links to studies showing supposed adverse health effects.
> 
> Straw man.  The question isn’t whether RF exposure has adverse health effects, the question is whether reducing that exposure is a net win or a net loss.  Those who are not innumerate tend to go for the “net win” side of that equation.

Gibberish.

- Greg
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://lists.ghserv.net/pipermail/lt/attachments/20210228/ea4a94e3/attachment.sig>