[DATAGOV Core] weekly check-in: going digital for this week

Giulia Campaioli g.campaioli at uva.nl
Thu Feb 12 12:59:31 CET 2026


Dear team,

I hope everyone is doing well, and that the workshop people are having a 
good and fruitful time, I look forward to hearing about it

Here's my bit from last week up to Monday:

- completed the CPDP paper submission with Jonas and Stefi's support; 
goes attached.

- *reviewed literature *on the Brazilian Digital Health strategy, 
particularly on the potentialities and concerns, the framework and 
applications; this is my entry point for my postdoctoral project, and in 
the next months it will take shape into an empirical paper in Portuguese 
(co-authored with the Brazilian research group I collaborate with, based 
on interviews) and a paper which I would like to co-author with one or 
more people from DATAGOV on health data infrastructures across countries 
(maybe a theoretical paper or a comparative policy analysis?) or across 
technologies within the same context (eSUS and CIN?) also depending on 
what others will be working on; a working draft goes attached, just FYI 
(sorry, in PT)

- reviewed and sent feedback of Matteo's blogpost and Stefi's article on 
human-data interaction;

- worked on the Infrastructural Inequalities blogpost - which I am still 
correcting, as I am fairly unsatisfied; I must admit I feel very rusty 
in writing something else than a paper and I guess I struggle with 
finding my voice, but I am not too far from finishing

- two people from the DMI project responded positively to an email where 
we invited them to work on a paper together, roughly based on the DMI 
project; Paul and Nicola will work in, respectively, South Africa and 
Italy to investigate the digitalization of public infrastructure, with a 
focus on digital IDs and an art-based/qualitative approach. I am not 
sure how this collaboration may take shape, it is definitely something 
to discuss also with Sruthi and Matteo as I wouldn't want this work to 
obstruct their pilot and phd project; suggestions are welcomed :)

- apart from the meeting with Ray on wednesday, I participated to the 
meeting with Framer Framed, of which Meg told you already;

- finally, on Monday I went to the Affective Learning training for 
teachers; what I found interesting for DATAGOV is that their toolbox for 
teaching could actually be an useful resource to do team-building and 
co-creation activities (maybe at the retreat?). I could look into it if 
it sounds interesting.

This week I am finishing the post and I have to submit my PhD thesis to 
the university of co-tutelle to obtain the double-degree - which also 
gives me the opportunity to revise the manuscript and prepare a first 
draft for INC; in this regard, I am finishing up the GDC application for 
funding + I secured some funding from my PhD to pay the work of an 
amazing publishing team (Geert Lovink, Anielek Niemyjski, and Mela 
Miekus, all from INC). The book will come out in June as Theory on 
Demand volume (if I don't burnout before then :)

Best,
Giulia


On 12/2/26 10:22, Meg Kitamura via Core wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Here is what I was up to last week (+Monday)
>
>  *
>     Sent out invitations through multiple channels. We currently have
>     55 signups (as of 10:00 AM today). There is unfortunately no
>     perfect way to share live updates, so I’ll send occasional updates
>     through links:
>     https://cryptpad.fr/sheet/#/2/sheet/edit/HUTvaJKcn3GyrefENpUC9bE5/
>     <https://cryptpad.fr/sheet/#/2/sheet/edit/HUTvaJKcn3GyrefENpUC9bE5/>
>  *
>     DATAGOV kick-off event went live on RMeS website (I’m still
>     waiting for them to update the text):
>     https://www.rmes.nl/datagov-kick-off-event/
>     <https://www.rmes.nl/datagov-kick-off-event/>
>  *
>     Had a meeting with Framer Framed on Monday. Please refer to my
>     previous email about the details.
>  *
>     Would like to schedule a meeting with Ray on the last week of
>     February. Could we decide between 24^th  (after 14:00) or 25^th
>      (after 12:00).
>
>
> Not directly DATAGOV related but sharing because relevant:
>
>  *
>     I’m co-writing a paper with Lonneke on how the Japanese government
>     is /digitalizing /and /infrastructuring///the classroom (and
>     subsequent resistance efforts, not strong but still present).
>     We’re trying to make an argument about the difference between
>     /platformizing /education vs. /infrastructuring/ education, the
>     latter creating a condition of “a point of no return,” which is a
>     phrase used by someone I interviewed in Japan.
>
>
> I hope the Norway workshop is fruitful! Excited to hear more about it 
> next week.
>
> Meg
>
> *From: *Core <core-bounces at lists.datagovlab.net> on behalf of Stefania 
> Milan via Core <core at lists.datagovlab.net>
> *Date: *Thursday, February 12, 2026 at 9:49
> *To: *core at lists.datagovlab.net <core at lists.datagovlab.net>
> *Subject: *[DATAGOV Core] weekly check-in: going digital for this week
>
> Dear all, this week we skipped our check-in moment. Check-ins are 
> important for a variety of reasons: it is fun to know what everyone 
> has been up to, and it is a great occasion to create synergies and ask 
> for feedback or support. And, importantly, at the more individual 
> level, it allows each of us to take stock of everything we did in just 
> one week: a well-deserved pat-on-the-back moment. In the busy life of 
> academia, we rarely make room for acknowledging and celebrating 
> progress (even when small), and focus almost exclusively on what’s 
> left to do (always too much). Finally, we are a group and it is our 
> chance to bringing to life the group, even when each of us is working 
> in different tasks and even locations.
>
> This is why I would like to have that check-in moment virtually for 
> this week. Please reply to this tread. It should cover last week, not 
> the current one ;-)
> I make a start. Please chip in.
>
> [what I have been up to - note that I focus only on what’s relevant 
> for DATAGOV! would be so tedious otherwise]
>
>  *
>     PhD pilot study monthly check-in: it is awesome to see what
>     bubbles under the surface of a title/concern.
>  *
>     Practicalities related to the kick-off event and many, many
>     personal invites were sent (still sending)
>  *
>     Lots of admin, from timesheets to fighting the reimbursement
>     madness. I am so frustrated things cannot run more smoothly. For
>     the records, the sage re our lunches/dinners still ongoing :/
>  *
>     Started preparing my upcoming lecture at Hasselt U, as part of the
>     chair I have over there this academic year. It is of relevance
>     here because the five lectures I am going there are modelled on
>     DATAGOV research programme. The one I am working on now is
>     entitled "The Datafied Citizen: Agency, Identity, and Belonging in
>     the Datafied State”. The good news is that I am writing down these
>     talks, and at the end I will have a nice substantive story to
>     share, maybe as a Working Paper for DATAGOV.
>
>
> [what I am working on]
>
>  *
>     a couple of belated book chapters (Listen to me: say no to
>     chapters. And help me to say no!)
>  *
>     more DATAGOV admin
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ghserv.net/pipermail/core/attachments/20260212/3de2278e/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: CPDPai25_134614_DATAGOV.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 412115 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ghserv.net/pipermail/core/attachments/20260212/3de2278e/attachment-0001.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Riscos e possibilidades da Sau?de Digital_Giulia.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 16847 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ghserv.net/pipermail/core/attachments/20260212/3de2278e/attachment-0001.docx>


More information about the Core mailing list