[Bigbang-dev] provenance and sharing collected archives

[Niels ten Oever]

Hi all,

I have no problem with closed repos for this, but why not keep it open
by default?

What we could also do (but maybe I am going on a limb here), is save it
all on a server which would automatically download/rsync new version of
the mailinglist.

Would this make sense?

I would have server space for this.

If we do this then it would be easier to provide access to it from
notebooks.

Just a thought, feel free to shoot it down.

Cheers,

Niels



Niels ten Oever
Head of Digital

Article 19
www.article19.org

PGP fingerprint    2458 0B70 5C4A FD8A 9488
                   643A 0ED8 3F3A 468A C8B3

On 08/25/2017 02:41 AM, Nick Doty wrote:
> My response might have been implicit before, but to be clear: I think
> having private repositories that are listed but only accessible to
> researchers upon request is a fine way, at least to begin with.
> 
> I would welcome any further review or guidance from experts on that
> ethical disclosure question.
> 
> Thanks,
> Nick
> 
>> On Aug 21, 2017, at 5:40 AM, Beraldo, Davide <d.beraldo at uva.nl
>> <mailto:d.beraldo at uva.nl>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> first of all, thanks a lot for keeping this on! and apologize for the
>> very long inactivity on this side; resolution for coming academic year
>> is to get more involved with programming for the good (aka not for
>> evil marketing people )
>>
>> on the issue of public repository: i am myself not an ethic fanatic,
>> but working with people who are made me a bit more paranoid; plus, the
>> DATACTIVE project has made some pretty strict ethical commitments with
>> the funders
>> . 
>> consequently, i think that making the repositories public would be too
>> much. i nonetheless see the good in having them stored somewhere and
>> let interested people access them. 
>> ---would it be possible to have the data stored, listed, but
>> accessible only at request? 
>>
>> in the meanwhile i can check with the ethics experts here what they
>> think about it
>>
>> cheers!
>>
>> Davide
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.ghserv.net/pipermail/bigbang-dev/attachments/20170825/4acf6fa0/attachment.sig>