[Bigbang-dev] provenance and sharing collected archives

[Nick Doty]

My response might have been implicit before, but to be clear: I think having private repositories that are listed but only accessible to researchers upon request is a fine way, at least to begin with.

I would welcome any further review or guidance from experts on that ethical disclosure question.

Thanks,
Nick

> On Aug 21, 2017, at 5:40 AM, Beraldo, Davide <d.beraldo at uva.nl> wrote:
> 
> Hi guys,
> 
> first of all, thanks a lot for keeping this on! and apologize for the very long inactivity on this side; resolution for coming academic year is to get more involved with programming for the good (aka not for evil marketing people )
> 
> on the issue of public repository: i am myself not an ethic fanatic, but working with people who are made me a bit more paranoid; plus, the DATACTIVE project has made some pretty strict ethical commitments with the funders
> .
> consequently, i think that making the repositories public would be too much. i nonetheless see the good in having them stored somewhere and let interested people access them.
> ---would it be possible to have the data stored, listed, but accessible only at request?
> 
> in the meanwhile i can check with the ethics experts here what they think about it
> 
> cheers!
> 
> Davide

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ghserv.net/pipermail/bigbang-dev/attachments/20170824/957225e6/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.ghserv.net/pipermail/bigbang-dev/attachments/20170824/957225e6/attachment.sig>