[liberationtech] Democrats rally around pledge not to use hacked documents (Wash Post)

Richard Brooks rrb at g.clemson.edu
Mon Apr 29 18:19:55 CEST 2019


I don't get it. So, they would not look at the Pentagon
Papers or other evidence of crimes that have been
suppressed?

It seems to me that the important thing is the information,
not the source. Or am I just ill-informed with regards to
journalism and ethics?

I get the fruit of a poisoned tree thing for government
prosecutions. But, won't this type of standard make it
easier to suppress whistle-blower information pointing
out government malfeasance?

https://s2.washingtonpost.com/camp-rw/?e=cnJiQGcuY2xlbXNvbi5lZHU%3D&s=5cc6e448fe1ff6510311c476



More information about the LT mailing list