[liberationtech] Should we start a new Stanford liberationtech-news list?
F LM
flucom.02 at gmail.com
Sun Feb 5 01:16:37 PST 2017
Personally, I would prefer to keep just one list for everything.
FL
> On 05-02-2017, at 01:27, Yosem Companys <companys at tmp.ucsb.edu> wrote:
>
> Well, I was thinking that this list would be for discussion. The other for the sharing and discussing of news articles. Not every discussion is initiated by news articles on this list.
>
> Also, if you look at our Twitter stream, we often send tweets every 10 minutes a day, so it provide those who do not want to use Twitter to see a review of the day's news right in their mailbox.
>
> We could take a vote, but I rather let others share their ideas and concerns before we do so.
>
> Thanks,
> Yosem
>
>> On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 3:39 PM, José María Mateos <chema at rinzewind.org> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 08:04:48PM -0800, Yosem Companys wrote:
>>> Building on Rich's suggestions, should we create a new liberationtech-news
>>> list for sharing Liberationtech news?
>>
>> How would that list be different from this one? Would all discussions be moved to that other list and this left for announcements?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> JMM.
>> --
>> Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at companys at stanford.edu.
>
> --
> Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at companys at stanford.edu.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/liberationtech/attachments/20170205/83259a5d/attachment.html>
More information about the liberationtech
mailing list