[liberationtech] 15 years later, why can't Johnny still not encrypt?

[Tempest]

carlo von lynX:
> 
> no. the title is correct. there are better tools, so don't start
> with PGP. 

"better" is the wrong term to use for programs that are yet to be
audited, espcially when the one you hype the most, pond, has an explicit
warning from the author to use gpg if you need security. this has been
pointed out to you multiple times before, and you simply ignore it.
thus, it calls your entire op-ed into question.

> the document explicitly states that PGP is better than nothing,

and the headline doesn't, all while the article claims unaudited
software is better, despite clear warnings otherwise. lol.
but, yes, i'm the one trolling you.