[liberationtech] Internet Censorship Gets Deeper in Turkey

[Yosem Companys]

From: F. Mutlu Binark <binark at baskent.edu.tr>

The law proposal and its justification, which has been presented to
the presidency of the Turkish Parliament by the approval of Justice
and Development Party about the change in “The regulation of
internet-based broadcasting and the struggle with crimes that are
committed via these broadcasting” is a threatening text in many ways.
The motion, which is expected to be passed inattentively within an
omnibus bill will not solve the existing problems. It includes
suggestions that would deteriorate the current status.

Firstly, at the justification part of the motion, there is not a
reference to the decision of European Human Rights Court against
Turkey with regard to this law (no. 5651). This decision, which has
been made as a consequence of Ahmet Yıldırım Case that Alternative
Informatics Association took it to the EHRC, approved the opposition
of this law against freedom of expression. What Internet users need in
Turkey is a reform of this law in terms of rights and freedoms and all
of the access restrictions should be excluded from the regulations.
However, the motion suggests the exact opposite by centralizing and
empowering the access restrictions.

The motion also pays no attention to the views of NGOs, which are
important actors of the subject. Each NGO that work within the
informatics field in Turkey is strongly criticizing this law.
Moreover, not only NGOs but also a great number of lawyers,
bureaucrats, politicians and internet publishers also criticize the
law. In contrast to the motion, they do not
consider access restrictions as a solution.

It’s really sad to see the motion uses “the discrimination card” to
justify the restrictions. Censorship never should be considered as a
solution to solve racism, hatred speech and sexism. Since we have lots
of examples of how the government interprets and enforces this kind of
laws in the recent history of Turkey, we’re concerned that this
justification will cause much more dangerous enforcements in the next
days.

The motion proposes to apply the IP and URL based access restriction
methods along with the domain name restriction which is the current
restriction method in Turkey. Also the motion adds the term of “et
cetera” to define the restrictions which may help the government to
easily apply different and dangerous restriction methods. As if IP and
URL based access restriction methods aren’t scary and dangerous
enough! Applying the URL based access restriction method actively; the
internet censorship level in Turkey will reach the internet censorship
level in China in a few years.  To achieve these methods the ISPs will
have to make some changes and configurations on their systems which
will lead us to a slow, controlling and monitored Internet.

On the other hand The ISP Union proposition will threaten net
neutrality and help large companies to entirely dominate the market.
Only the companies with the proper ban and control utilities can be a
member of this unity and the other non-member companies cannot able to
provide internet services anymore which leads some of them to file for
bankruptcy
and hand the market in to the big players. Decreasing agent numbers on
the market will help the government to control and monitor users much
more easily. Rising of the controlling and surveillance because of the
Weak compotation on the market will be a threat for our rights and
freedoms and especially for net neutrality.

The projected period for the ISPs to retain data is 1-2 years which is
a very long period. The Government’s need for retaining data for this
long, brings to mind the possibility of using the data to profile
people for various purposes or even worse to tag them. Considering all
the subjects we mentioned above, it’s safe to say this regulation will
make the situation much more worse. We believe that amending Law No:
5651 will only empower the parts of the law which are criticized by
the people for a very long time.

As we stated in our Association’s “The State of Internet in Turkey in
2013 Report” [1] what should be done, is not to extend censorship and
banning policies but to bridge digital divide, to popularize the usage
of internet and to improve the new media literacy.

As the Alternative Informatics Association we are in the favor of a
freer and less controlled internet where people freely express
themselves and access all the information they need without any
surveillance. Unfortunately this regulation ignores the objectivity of
the networks, makes it easier to restrict the freedom of speech,
controlling and surveillance on the internet by establishing monopoly.
Carrying a motion with this content will cause the internet in Turkey
to plunge into the darkness permanently.

We invite the members of the parliament who legislate law in behalf of
internet users, the users, NGOs who represent them and the subject
matter experts to consider the verdict of (ECHR).

We also invite our citizens to look after the Internet and to support
the events actively which will be held Worldwide against censorship,
control and surveillance acts.

January 6th 2014
www.alternatifbilisim.org


--
Prof.Dr. Mutlu Binark
Baskent Universitesi
Iletisim Fakultesi
Radyo-Tv. ve Sinema Blm.
Bagl�ca Kampusu
Eskisehir Yolu 20.km.
06530 Ankara
Tel: (312) 246 6652-53
Fax: (312) 246 66 57
www.yenimedya.wordpress.com
www.dijitaloyun.wordpress.com
alternatifbilisim.tv