[liberationtech] Naive Question

[Jon Camfield]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday, September 11, 2013 05:52 PM, R. Jason Cronk wrote:
> Anything which potentially signaled your receipt of an NSL would
> be grounds for prosecution under the gag-order. This is what the
> prosecutor was alluding to when he signaled that Lavabit's shut
> down was tantamount to a violation because his shut down
> essentially communicated the fact that he was under a court order
> to do something which he couldn't talk about.

For large companies, I wonder how resignations would count in this?
Could an NSL require, say, the lead cryptographer of an org to /not/
resign?

> 
> Making your service secure such that you can't be forced to do this
> sort of thing (or such that it would be obvious, say open in
> reviewing your open source code) would be the only way to go.
> 
> *R. Jason Cronk, Esq., CIPP/US* /Privacy Engineering Consultant/,
> *Enterprivacy Consulting Group* <enterprivacy.com>
> 
> * phone: (828) 4RJCESQ * twitter: @privacymaverick.com * blog:
> http://blog.privacymaverick.com
> 
> 
> 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=nwpH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----