[liberationtech] Please Vote on "Reply to" Question
Katherine Maher
katherine.maher at gmail.com
Fri Mar 22 06:55:36 PDT 2013
Reply to all.
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 8:38 PM, Enrique Piraces <piracee at hrw.org> wrote:
> Reply to all.
>
> Best,
> Enrique Piracés
> Human Rights Watch
> https://www.hrw.org
> https://www.twitter.com/epiraces
>
> On Mar 20, 2013, at 9:17 PM, Yosem Companys wrote:
>
> Dear Liberationtech list subscribers,
>
> Several of you have petitioned to change Liberationtech mailing list's
> default "reply to" option from "reply-to-all" to "reply-to-poster." Given
> the debate (see links below), we have decided to put the issue up for a
> vote:
>
> - Do you want replies to Liberationtech list messages directed to
> "reply-to-all" or "reply-to-poster"?
>
> Please vote by submitting your preference to me by 11.59 pm PST
> on Sunday, March 24, 2013. Any votes received after this date and time
> will not be counted.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Yosem
> One of your moderators
>
> PS To read a summary of the advantages and disadvantages of
> "reply-to-all", click on the corresponding links below:
>
> - Reply-to-all considered useful:
> http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/reply-to-useful.html
> - Reply-to-all considered harmful:
> http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
>
> If you'd like to read the entire debate on the Liberationtech list,
> please click on the links below:
>
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03767.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03768.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03769.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03771.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03772.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03773.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03774.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03775.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03776.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03777.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03778.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03779.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03780.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03781.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03782.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03783.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03788.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03789.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03790.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03791.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03799.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03801.html
>
> --
> Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by
> emailing moderator at companys at stanford.edu or changing your settings at
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
>
>
>
> --
> Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by
> emailing moderator at companys at stanford.edu or changing your settings at
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
>
--
*Katherine R. Maher*
katherine.maher at gmail.com
@krmaher <https://www.twitter.com/krmaher>
US: +1 203 858 7316
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/liberationtech/attachments/20130322/139f1515/attachment.html>
More information about the liberationtech
mailing list