[liberationtech] Please Vote on "Reply to" Question

[Guilherme Andrade]

Reply-to-poster.


Cheers,

On 21/03/13 01:17 , Yosem Companys wrote:
> Dear Liberationtech list subscribers,
>
> Several of you have petitioned to change Liberationtech mailing list's
> default "reply to" option from "reply-to-all" to "reply-to-poster."
>  Given the debate (see links below), we have decided to put the issue
> up for a vote:
>
>   * Do you want replies to Liberationtech list messages directed to
>     "reply-to-all" or "reply-to-poster"?  
>
> Please vote by submitting your preference to me by 11.59 pm PST
> on Sunday, March 24, 2013.  Any votes received after this date and
> time will not be counted.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Yosem
> One of your moderators
>
> PS  To read a summary of the advantages and disadvantages of
> "reply-to-all", click on the corresponding links below:
>
>   * Reply-to-all considered
>     useful: http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/reply-to-useful.html
>   * Reply-to-all considered
>     harmful: http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
>
> If you'd like to read the entire debate on the Liberationtech list,
> please click on the links below:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03767.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03768.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03769.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03771.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03772.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03773.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03774.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03775.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03776.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03777.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03778.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03779.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03780.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03781.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03782.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03783.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03788.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03789.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03790.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03791.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03799.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03801.html
>
>
>
> --
> Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at companys at stanford.edu or changing your settings at https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech

-- 
Guilherme Andrade