[liberationtech] CJDNS hype

[Caleb James DeLisle]

Right, I didn't explain that well.
It would be a botnet of machines which are already part of the cjdns network.
Not something we have to worry about today or tomorrow but if it becomes a
new defacto standard for the internet, it would be a concern.

Thanks,
Caleb


On 07/15/2013 07:12 AM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 8:28 PM, Caleb James DeLisle
> <calebdelisle at lavabit.com> wrote:
>> You'd need a botnet to attack the network because then you could have
>> nodes spread out over physical space but clustered in keyspace.
> 
> And, presumably, convince people to connect to them. If I understood correctly?
> --
> Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at companys at stanford.edu or changing your settings at https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
>