[liberationtech] 31.170.160.0/22 filtered on ATT? (was Re: Website censorship in the US)

[Andy Isaacson]

On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 03:42:33PM -0500, Alfredo Lopez wrote:
> On 12/18/2013 03:24 PM, Andy Isaacson wrote:
> > CCing NANOG, since this might be of interest there.  Please keep
> > the discussion focused on technical routing issues rather than
> > politics or conspiracy theories.
> > 
> 
> I don't understand this, Andy. Isn't politics the purpose of this
> list? Otherwise, it just becomes another tech list. Or am I missing
> something?

This particular sub-thread is about the technical aspects of this block.
Such technical aspects are relevant both to liberationtech and to NANOG.

I'm in favor of libtech maintaining a political bent.  That is part of
its list charter.

I'm not in favor of libtech's political bent leaking onto NANOG.  That
is not part of the NANOG charter.

There's an intersection of interests in this particular scenario, and I
was attempting to craft an intersectional discussion.

However, both lists are subscriber-only, so my attempt is a failure.
(And in retrospect was probably misguided, neither audience is
especially willing to meet the other halfway.)

-andy