[liberationtech] Is spideroak really zero-knowledge?

[Tom O]

I'm not saying they cant. I'm saying they acknowledge it, althought the way
they do makes it seem as if its a non-issue.

I don't think it is.

I prefer tahoe-lafs


On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Percy Alpha <percyalpha at gmail.com> wrote:

> @Tom, "For this amount of time your password is stored in encrypted
> memory" but to actually use the key, the key has to be in plain-text form
> for sometime, during which it can be (forced to )intercepted.
>
> If they can force Lavabit to intercept users' emails, why can't they ask
> spideroak to secretly intercept users' moible app login?
>
> --
> Liberationtech is a public list whose archives are searchable on Google.
> Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated:
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech.
> Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at
> companys at stanford.edu.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/liberationtech/attachments/20130813/85956552/attachment.html>