[liberationtech] Self-determined publics
Michael Allan
mike at zelea.com
Sun Aug 4 10:33:40 PDT 2013
Thanks all, for the helpful pointers. I read each of the suggested
texts, at least in part. Here's a summary: Heather Marsh (Concentric
groups, knowledge bridges and epistemic communities); Chris Kelty (Two
bits, recursive publics); Anthony Cohen (Symbolic construction of
community); Sebastian Benthall (Weird Twitter); and Michael Warner
(Publics and counterpublics).
I posted a broader definition of "self-determined publics" to Air-L,
one that allows formal boundary criteria (styles of communication,
media, etc.) in addition to topical criteria. As Jack Harris notes,
this broader definition would cover the Occupy movement (OccupySandy):
http://listserv.aoir.org/pipermail/air-l-aoir.org/2013-July/028326.html
Which got me thinking it would also cover the community of a mailing
list, or of Twitter, and that this would be inconsistent. I think we
can speak correctly of a self-determined public *on the topic* of
Weird Twitter, but not *in the form* of weird, or *in the form* of
Twitter. Restricting the public to a given form necessarily restricts
access, which makes it less of a public. The weird form in particular
seems more appropriate to the definition of a counterpublic (Warner).
And Twitter is an external authority, something to which no self-
-determined public may be bound. So I think I was wrong here and I
shouldn't have introduced formal boundaries; publics are better
identified by topical criteria.
I constructed a prototype of a "boundary proclamation", or what I call
in this case a "public mirror". Here's the front of the mirror where
the public's image is reflected: http://www.reddit.com/r/MirMir/new/
The topic there is "mirroring and the self-determination of publics";
I'm thinking it might be possible to bootstrap one of these things.
Mike
> Folks,
>
> Below I define what I call "self-determined publics". Has anything
> similar been attempted before?
>
> A self-determined public is an open, topical community that
> proclaims the definitive bounds of its own communications. The
> proclamation takes the form of a timely sequence of references
> (e.g. web links) each pointing to a communication of the public,
> such that all references together define the total of that public's
> communications in time and space. For example:
>
> Ago Place Title (click to visit thread)
> ------- --------- ------------------------------------------
> 17 min r/Foo How do we attach the doohickey?
> 5 hr Foo-L The problem with so and so's proposal.
> 1 day FuBarz Who are these Foos, anyway?
> 1 day r/Foo This, that, and the next thing.
> 2 days FooStack What's the best thingamy for such and such?
> . . . and so on
>
> The boundary proclamation is similar in form to a conventional news
> feed. It concerns a specific topic or category. Differences are
> in a) the exclusion of mass communications, b) the claim to
> totality, and c) the self-determination that redeems that claim.
> (a) A principle criterion for inclusion is that one may immediately
> join any of the referenced communications as a peer. One-way, mass
> communications are excluded.
>
> (b) The boundary proclamation claims to cover the entire public
> discussion of the topic across all communication media and sites.
> It claims to be the most complete, accurate and timely overview of
> the extended discussion that is available anywhere.
>
> (c) This claim is redeemed by the public members themselves who
> submit the references, self-organize the necessary labour, and
> self-constitute the necessary government. No aspect of this
> redeeming self-determination is controlled by an external
> authority.
>
>
> I'm looking for brief pointers, please. I don't know of any actual
> implementations of this, or projects that are working on it. I'll
> share what's found.
>
> --
> Michael Allan
>
> Toronto, +1 416-699-9528
> http://zelea.com/
More information about the liberationtech
mailing list