[liberationtech] Jacob Appelbaum's Ultrasurf Report

[Michael Rogers]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 27/04/12 09:10, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> So oversimplifying a bit, we thought we had a choice between "high 
> security, high latency" and "low security, low latency". But the
> trouble is that while Mixminion's design can provide more safety in
> theory, it needs the users before it can provide this safety in
> practice. Without enough users sending messages to mix with, high
> and variable latency by itself doesn't cut it.

Hi Roger,

Does the Mixminion protocol make it possible to send a message through
the network that (intentionally) has the sender's address intact when
it emerges from the network?

I'm wondering whether it would be possible to write a Thunderbird
extension that would route all the user's email through Mixminion to
provide cover traffic for anonymous senders.

Cheers,
Michael
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPrD9EAAoJEBEET9GfxSfM8IIH/RumQk7RqvLRasFRH1anZCAs
Fo8zjoBa3j/1qEq935XJe0HSiluNAx+bQ64j612agdGk2sSg5siicnPdoc9SixRR
a/7lsrXlgpv5CQOCTPgSfZty3LUKye5zoVQFUPi4aM7C4PHLrgDjdYbFPUb87wOM
HDNW+gF9lx/S/qJV1njThSJkKcWjHOGhviThaFR5SdnokOXOyythlqdTnq0V5OWh
88xtYYr+/4eU/r6hqVGZTuFN5HtqJ+074xqkl3ax82Niy6DLHpHsbk9V66/YZFL6
4RS9pGev2QjuKilHzboazUIC0hWb0inoUZC3Zx3FmHUFFjgGcAHPIqvXLEYSTmE=
=cf6G
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----