[liberationtech] Liberationtech Mailing List Survey
Jillian C. York
jilliancyork at gmail.com
Sun Aug 19 10:17:10 PDT 2012
I guess I assumed that we were waiting for a proper survey, but here are my
responses:
- doesn't matter, the list is already open and thus inherently public
- entire list
- add "--"
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Yosem Companys <companys at stanford.edu>wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Based on your feedback, a short 3-question survey of the Liberationtech
> community will be conducted to determine what changes to implement. The
> survey will be conducted through Thursday, August 16, 2012, and aggregated
> survey results will be released on Friday, August 17, 2012. Changes to
> mailing list guidelines will occur shortly thereafter.
>
> To provide background info on the survey questions, the feedback you have
> sent either privately or to the whole list over the past few days has been
> summarized below under "policy implications."
>
> Should you have any questions, please let me know.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Yosem
> List Moderator
>
>
>
> *SURVEY:*
>
> - Would you like to make the Liberationtech archives *public* or *
> private*?
> - Public
> - Private
> - Should reply-to's be sent to the *entire list* or the *individual
> sender*?
> - Entire List
> - Individual Sender
> - Should we reduce or eliminate the list-email signature text?
> - Keep text signature as is
> - Add "-- " prior to text signature to enable auto-hiding in most
> mailers
> - Eliminate text signature completely
>
> *POLICY IMPLICATIONS:*
>
> - Public or private:
> - Public implies making the archives public both within mailman,
> and we would also allow automatic, real-time mirroring of the list.
> Easiest to do for simplicity and transparency's sake. Mailing list
> guidelines would also be amended to reflect the change.
> - Private means that we would make the archives private and, if
> possible, add Internet standard email headers or robot exclusions to
> restrict or prohibit archiving. Mailing list guidelines would also be
> amended to reflect the change.
> - Reply to entire list or individual sender:
> - Advantage of replying to individual sender includes preventing
> personal replies from being inadvertently sent to the entire list.
> - Advantages of replying to entire list include:
> - Preventing people who forward emails from the list from
> unnecessarily exposing subscribers' email addresses
> - Preventing list server from having to filter email to
> subscribers who are in To: or Cc: (if anything goes wrong, they get an
> email twice)
> - Reducing both the strain on the server and the risk of
> triggering spam filters
> - Signature
> - Signature currently includes instructions on how to change
> subscription options (an issue that constantly recurs on the list) and our
> Twitter address. See below:
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> liberationtech mailing list
> liberationtech at lists.stanford.edu
>
> Should you need to change your subscription options, please go to:
>
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
>
> If you would like to receive a daily digest, click "yes" (once you click
> above) next to "would you like to receive list mail batched in a daily
> digest?"
>
> You will need the user name and password you receive from the list
> moderator in monthly reminders. You may ask for a reminder here:
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
>
> Should you need immediate assistance, please contact the list moderator.
>
> Please don't forget to follow us on http://twitter.com/#!/Liberationtech
>
--
*+1-857-891-4244 |** jilliancyork.com | @jilliancyork *
"We must not be afraid of dreaming the seemingly impossible if we want the
seemingly impossible to become a reality" - *Vaclav Havel*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/liberationtech/attachments/20120819/14d72485/attachment.html>
More information about the liberationtech
mailing list