[Bigbang-dev] paper on IETF and mailing list analysis
Niels ten Oever
niels at article19.org
Tue Mar 27 12:41:02 CEST 2018
Nice find Nick - also no idea how I missed this.
I personally liked the deduplication paper better than the Analysis of
IETF activity paper, the graph on affiliation is rly nice and useful
though.
https://isoc.app.box.com/v/IETF101-Photos-Hackathon/file/284378066136
Happy to link with other people and understand their approaches!
Best,
Niels
Niels ten Oever
Article 19
www.article19.org
PGP fingerprint 2458 0B70 5C4A FD8A 9488
643A 0ED8 3F3A 468A C8B3
On 03/26/2018 11:03 PM, Nick Doty wrote:
> Also, it looks like their follow-on paper specifically considers the
> problem of identifying individuals who use different email addresses,
> what we've been working on and calling "entity resolution":
> https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-70284-1_23
>
> And following citations from these papers, I see that there's an ongoing
> project at the Syracuse I School about studying open source software
> development communities, called FLOSSmole. That includes trying to
> gather common datasets to share for analysis, and one of the people
> involved has written about common infrastructure for studying mailing
> list archives.
> http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/6664730/?anchor=references
>
> Note, some of these websites are kinda broken because their certificates
> are messed up, but if you're willing to risk adding an exception, I
> think the static content is still fine:
> https://flossmole.org/
> https://floss.syr.edu/
>
> I'm not sure how I missed all this before, but I think there is existing
> work / people to collaborate with.
>
> —Nick
>
>> On Mar 26, 2018, at 4:37 PM, Nick Doty <npdoty at ischool.berkeley.edu
>> <mailto:npdoty at ischool.berkeley.edu>> wrote:
>>
>> Has anyone seen this paper or spoken with the authors?
>>
>> Niedermayer, Heiko, et al. "An analysis of IETF activities using
>> mailing lists and social media." /International Conference on Internet
>> Science/. Springer, Cham, 2016.
>>
>> https://www.net.in.tum.de/fileadmin/bibtex/publications/papers/INSCI_2016.pdf
>>
>> Authors are at the Technical University of Munich.
>>
>> It's remarkably similar / related to our current working on analysis
>> of IETF activity using mailing lists, and even includes some similar
>> graphs to ones I've shown on perpass / other list activity
>> post-Snowden. They also looked at Twitter references to RFCs, although
>> they appear to conclude that there isn't as much going on there. They
>> could also be potential collaborators; I'm not sure if there's a whole
>> lot else they've done here but I think there's at least one follow-on
>> paper from last year.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Nick
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bigbang-dev mailing list
> Bigbang-dev at data-activism.net
> https://lists.ghserv.net/mailman/listinfo/bigbang-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.ghserv.net/pipermail/bigbang-dev/attachments/20180327/5d02f0fc/attachment.sig>
More information about the Bigbang-dev
mailing list