<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(51,51,51)">Hi all,</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(51,51,51)"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(51,51,51)">After discussion with Niels, I started a draft for updates to RFC 7725: <a href="http://shivankaul.com/drafts-451/draft-new-protocol-elements-451.html">http://shivankaul.com/drafts-451/draft-new-protocol-elements-451.html</a> </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(51,51,51)"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(51,51,51)">I proposed that we introduce a new provisional header for specifying the geographical scope of the block in the response, and that we have another Link rel for 'blocking authority'. There were other recommendations made in the implementation report draft, but I chose two important ones.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(51,51,51)"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(51,51,51)">Also fixed some formatting and grammatical stuff in the implementation report draft: <a href="http://shivankaul.com/drafts-451/draft-451-imp-report.html">http://shivankaul.com/drafts-451/draft-451-imp-report.html</a></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(51,51,51)"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(51,51,51)">Will continue to work on refining these. GitHub repo: <a href="https://github.com/ShivanKaul/drafts-451">https://github.com/ShivanKaul/drafts-451</a> </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(51,51,51)"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(51,51,51)">We make certain statements in the implementation report draft but we don't have links to the data to support those statements. It would be great if we could have that.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(51,51,51)"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(51,51,51)">Comments and suggestions on everything extremely welcome.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(51,51,51)"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(51,51,51)">Thanks,</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(51,51,51)">Shivan </div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 4:12 PM, Amelia Andersdotter <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:amelia@article19.org" target="_blank">amelia@article19.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hey all,<br>
<br>
I've some rough ideas for what we could discuss during the hackathon,<br>
<br>
1) Continuing work on the draft report[1] and maybe moving towards<br>
revising the RFC?<br>
<br>
2) Strategising around implementation: should we target specific<br>
companies? I have some euro-centric thoughts relating to telcos, but<br>
others as well.<br>
<br>
3) Delving deeper into statistics! The draft implementation report shows<br>
discrepancies between implementation in different countries - can we<br>
find out why?<br>
<br>
Do they sound like good ideas for discussion and activities moving forward?<br>
<br>
[1] <a href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-451-imp-report-00" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://tools.ietf.org/html/<wbr>draft-451-imp-report-00</a><br>
<br>
Looking forward to hearing everyone's views!<br>
<br>
best regards,<br>
<br>
Amelia<br>
<div><div class="h5"><br>
On 2017-10-16 13:36, Niels ten Oever wrote:<br>
> Hi all,<br>
><br>
> I registered for the hackathon in Singapore, would be great if other<br>
> people who are interested can register as well.<br>
><br>
> Cheers,<br>
><br>
> Niels<br>
><br>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------<br>
> Subject: [hackathon] Public Interest<br>
> Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 12:26:10 +0200<br>
> From: Niels ten Oever <<a href="mailto:niels@article19.org">niels@article19.org</a>><br>
> To: <a href="mailto:hackathon@ietf.org">hackathon@ietf.org</a><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
</div></div><span class="">> ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
> StatusCode451 mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:StatusCode451@digitaldissidents.org">StatusCode451@<wbr>digitaldissidents.org</a><br>
</span>> <a href="https://lists.ghserv.net/mailman/listinfo/statuscode451" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.ghserv.net/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/statuscode451</a><br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
Amelia Andersdotter<br>
Technical Consultant, Digital Programme<br>
<br>
ARTICLE19<br>
<a href="http://www.article19.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">www.article19.org</a><br>
<br>
PGP: 3D5D B6CA B852 B988 055A 6A6F FEF1 C294 B4E8 0B55<br>
<span class=""><br>
<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
StatusCode451 mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:StatusCode451@digitaldissidents.org">StatusCode451@<wbr>digitaldissidents.org</a><br>
</span><a href="https://lists.ghserv.net/mailman/listinfo/statuscode451" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.ghserv.net/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/statuscode451</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>