<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
</head>
<body>
<div style="direction: ltr; font-family: Aptos, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
Hi Giulia,</div>
<div style="direction: ltr; font-family: Aptos, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<br>
</div>
<div style="direction: ltr; font-family: Aptos, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
Thank you for this. I agree, using the next reading group meeting to improve this chapter before the deadline could be a good idea! Hope we can find a slot that’s compatible with Matteo’s NATO schedule to discuss the ethnography readings next time :)</div>
<div style="direction: ltr; font-family: Aptos, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<br>
</div>
<div style="direction: ltr; font-family: Aptos, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
Can we also set up a meeting between Matteo, you and me early next week to get started on these revisions? Would Monday (28th) morning, say 11 AM work for both of you? Happy to have the rest of the team too of course for more guidance!</div>
<div style="direction: ltr; font-family: Aptos, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<br>
</div>
<div style="direction: ltr; font-family: Aptos, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
Best,</div>
<div style="direction: ltr; font-family: Aptos, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
Sruthi</div>
<div style="direction: ltr; font-family: Aptos, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<br>
</div>
<div id="mail-editor-reference-message-container">
<div style="padding: 3pt 0in 0in; border-width: 1pt medium medium; border-style: solid none none; border-color: rgb(181, 196, 223) currentcolor currentcolor;">
<div style="text-align: left; font-family: Aptos; font-size: 12pt; color: black;">
<b>From: </b>Core <core-bounces@lists.datagovlab.net> on behalf of Giulia Campaioli via Core <core@lists.datagovlab.net><br>
<b>Date: </b>Wednesday, 23 September 2026 at 15:27<br>
<b>To: </b>core@lists.datagovlab.net <core@lists.datagovlab.net><br>
<b>Subject: </b>[DATAGOV Core] NEXT Reading Group proposal<br>
<br>
</div>
</div>
<div id="mail-editor-reference-message-body">
<div class="ms-outlook-mobile-reference-message skipProofing" style="direction: ltr;">
</div>
<p class="ms-outlook-mobile-reference-message skipProofing">Dear team,</p>
<p class="ms-outlook-mobile-reference-message skipProofing">A few days ago I received the response from the editors of the CPDP book. Good news, we got two strong acceptance; bad news, we also got one strong rejection. <br>
<br>
This happens. Peer-review is a central aspect of our job and, while it can sometimes be tedious to work again and again on a paper (often with a short deadline) it certainly helps us improve the quality of our research. I have no doubt that, even if the chapter
was eventually fully rejected, our work would only come out improved from this process. So I propose that we do what is in our power to fix the chapter and resubmit.</p>
<p class="ms-outlook-mobile-reference-message skipProofing">Notice that we have a very strict deadline: October 4th to send the revised manuscript. Difficult, but doable. <br>
<br>
However, we do not have much time to meet and discuss how we can improve this text. <br>
<br>
So, I would like to propose, if everyone is okay with this idea (and do not feel obligated to say yes): how about we use the next reading group session to read an article to complement the list of references of the chapter, and strengthen the theoretical framework
of the paper? - And in general also in sight of the upcoming theoretical working paper. <br>
<br>
If anyone does not want to do this, feel free to say it as a response to this email, or answering directly to me, and I will take a step back and cancel this idea. <br>
<br>
I just think it would be really help to hear your impressions and ideas around a couple readings to complement this text, especially Carina and Jonas, since you are not going to work on the revision. But of course, again, not necessary if you prefer to touch
other subjects (e.g. comparative ethnography, as Matteo was suggesting the other day!)<br>
<br>
In case you like the idea, I would suggest the following two readings: <br>
<br>
</p>
<p class="ms-outlook-mobile-reference-message skipProofing">Amoore, L. (2024). The deep border.
<i>Political Geography</i>, <i>109</i>, 102547.</p>
<p class="ms-outlook-mobile-reference-message skipProofing">Hussain, N. (2026). Digital Health Inequities: Analysing Barriers to Access Across Demographic Groups in India.
<i>Journal of Development Policy and Practice</i>, <i>11</i>(1), 105-119. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/24551333251382726" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" originalsrc="https://doi.org/10.1177/24551333251382726" data-outlook-id="0a524b4d-91e8-4bca-ba51-81e13bf3ca35" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;">
https://doi.org/10.1177/24551333251382726</a></p>
<p class="ms-outlook-mobile-reference-message skipProofing">If you have better proposals please bring them on! I thought of these two cause they touch both border technologies and indian healthcare techs, but happy to hear your thoughts, especially if you think
it is too much stuff to read for next Monday!<br>
<br>
Best, <br>
Giulia</p>
<div id="ms-outlook-mobile-signature" dir="ltr">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="direction: ltr; margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: black;">
<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>